Write strategy determining method, optical disc recording method, optical disc and optical disc apparatus

ABSTRACT

An optical disc recording method of suppressing variations in the record quality due to variations in an initial strategy of a write strategy using many parameters corresponding to a next-generation large-capacity optical disc. Modulation conditions for recorded data on the optical disc are determined based on a real measurement thereof; an initial strategy that meets the modulation conditions is determined; an optical strategy is determined in which the record quality is best in the vicinity of the initial strategy; and data is recorded on the optical disc, using the optimal strategy.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

The present application claims priority from Japanese applicationJP2006-205556 filed on Jul. 28, 2006, the content of which is herebyincorporated by reference into this application.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a technique for recording informationon an optical disc.

JP-A-2003-85753 (Patent literature 1) says: “A recording waveformaccording to a write strategy in the present embodiment includes a toppulse 40, an intermediate bias part 41 and a last pulse 42. The part ofthe recording pulse waveform excluding those pulse parts is maintainedat a level of read power PR. The write strategy employed in the presentinvention uses binary write power. The top and last pulses 40 and 42have first write power Ph, and the intermediate bias part 41 has secondwrite power Pm, which is set so as to be higher than the read power PRand lower than the first write power Ph.”

The Patent literature 1 also says: “When a space between adjacent marksis short, it is effective to shift the end positions of the adjacentrecord marks, thereby forming a shorter mark than the actual one.”

JP-A-2000-30254 (Patent literature 2) says: “In a method of recording ashortest mark and other marks on an optical information recordingmedium, using respective different record strategies, the point is toselect a write strategy such that a recording power in which a jittercontaining all the record marks or a jitter containing only the shortestrecord mark is minimum is substantially equal to the recording power inwhich a deviation from a theoretical value of the longest record mark isminimum.”

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An information recording layer of an optical disc such as a DVD-RAM or aDVD-R is arranged to have first and second states different inreflectance wherein the first state is changed reversibly or otherwiseirreversibly to the second states depending on the thermal conditions.The optical disc whose state change is reversible is called a rewritabledisc while an optical disc whose state change is irreversible is calleda write-once type disc. In these optical discs, a laser beam is focusedas a fine optical spot on the information recording layer of the disc,and injects local energy to the spot to heat the same, thereby forming apredetermined repeated pattern where the first state (or space) andsecond state (or mark) are present in a mixed manner, which leads torecording information. Recording of the information using the thermalchanges will be influenced by thermal interference in which when aparticular mark has been recorded, the heat injected by the laser beamwill diffuse, thereby influencing on the formation of marks precedingand following the particular mark. Qualitatively, as the interval orspace length between two successive marks is reduced, the heatinterference increases and vise versa. Thus, the disc temperature at thestart of the mark recording varies depending on the space length. As aresult, the head edge of the mark can deviate depending on the spacelength.

A method of changing an irradiation power level of the laser beam on thetime base is called a write strategy. The recording characteristic of anoptical disc varies depending on the various physical characteristics,configuration having grooves and recording conditions, such as therecord density and speed, of the optical disc. Thus, the write strategyis an important factor that influences the recording performance, andvarious record strategies have been devised so far.

Recently, a quantity of data handled by optical discs is increasing andhence the density of recorded data goes up steadily. Compared to CDshaving a capacity of approximately 700 MB (megabytes), DVDs having acapacity of approximately 4.7 GB (gigabytes) including theaforementioned DVD-RAMs are now used by far more widely. Further,large-capacity next-generation optical discs having 20 GB or more wherehigh-definition videos are recordable for two hours are being developedand available commercially. As an example of the next-generation opticaldiscs, there are Blu-ray Discs (hereinafter referred to as BDs). ForBDs, a short-wavelength laser having a wavelength of 405 nm band(blue-violet) is used as a light source with an object lens having anincreased numerical aperture of 0.85. 1-7 PP modulation codes areemployed for modulation. For DVDs, the mark and space lengths are 3-11Tw where Tw represents the width of a data detection window whereas forBDs, the mark and space lengths are 2-8 Tw. (Note that for DVDs, aspecial pattern used for synchronization has 14 Tw, whereas for BDs, thepattern used has 9 Tw.) As a result, the shortest mark and space lengthsin a line direction are approximately 0.42 μm for the DVD-RAMs and 0.15μm for BDs with an interval between adjacent mark and space beingphysically shorter than before. For the track intervals, the DVD-RAMshave approximately 0.62 μm whereas the BDs have approximately 0.32 μm.

In the large-capacity next-generation optical discs, the mark and spacesizes have been physically reduced. Thus, there remarkably appears aproblem that the thermal interference due to the energy injected whenthe mark is recorded varies depending on the space length. If thepreceding space length changes, for example, to 2, 3, 4 and 5 Tw ormore, and even when marks of the same lengths are recorded, thepositions of the head edges of the marks deviates. Thus, fine control ofthe write strategy is required, including increasing variable parametersto be controlled, and rendering different the respective parameters ofthe write strategy depending on the preceding space and record marklengths.

As just described above, in the write strategy having many variableparameters, the method of determining the respective parameters is moreimportant than before.

Generally, the respective parameters of the write strategy are notensured for orthogonality. Thus, if any particular parameter is changedfor optimization, the optimal values of other parameters would changeand hence it is very difficult to obtain the optimal values of therespective parameters independently.

A reproduction jitter of recorded data used generally as an evaluationindex of the write strategy may not function as the evaluation indexbecause the jitter can be properly measured only for recorded data goodto some extent.

Therefore, a kind of trial and error method has been often used in whichan initial strategy capable of recording data well to some extent isgiven and the respective parameters are determined by changing theseparameters bit by bit such that the jitter is minimized as theevaluation index. Alternatively, in the case of the write strategy wherethe number of parameters is small, the prior art technique described inPatent literature 2 was used sometimes.

At all events, since the respective parameters used were determined inthe vicinity of the initial strategy, results varied depending on howthe initial strategy was given. As a result, it is undesirable forensuring the recording performance of the optical disc apparatuss orensuring compatibility between the optical disc apparatuss that therecord qualities of the reproduced jitters are uneven. The unevenness ofthe recorded qualities will be more remarkable as the number ofparameters of the write strategy is larger as in the aforementionedlarge-capacity next-generation optical discs, and the problem isconsidered to get severer.

As viewed from another angle, although it is not ensured that theevaluation of the conventional write strategy will be performed in anoptimal manner by a minimum point search, a method of determining theinitial strategy is not sufficiently considered.

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide arecording method and optical disc for suppressing variations in therecord quality due to variations in the initial strategies whendetermining many parameters of the write strategy corresponding to thenext-generation large-capacity optical disc.

In order to solve the above problem, the present invention usesstructures described as an example in the claims appended hereto.

According to the present invention, the reliability of the recorded datais improved.

Other objects, features and advantages of the invention will becomeapparent from the following description of the embodiments of theinvention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a write strategy used in the present invention;

FIG. 2 shows a lookup table for a parameter dTtop of the write strategyin the present invention;

FIG. 3 illustrates a reproduced signal waveform and a modulationdefinition in the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates a repeated signal waveform of 8-Tw marks and 8-Twspaces in the present invention;

FIG. 5 shows a layout of data recording tracks when the modulationconditions for the initial strategy are determined in the presentinvention;

FIG. 6 shows evaluation plots when the initial strategy modulationconditions are determined in the present invention;

FIG. 7 is a flowchart of an optimal write strategy determining method inthe present invention;

FIG. 8 shows a layout of areas of an optical disc in the presentinvention;

FIG. 9 shows a first evaluation plot used when an optimal 2-Tw parameteris determined in the present invention; and

FIG. 10 shows a second evaluation plot used when an optimal 2-Twparameter is determined in the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

A method of recording data on a write-once optical disc as an embodimentof the present invention will be described with reference to theaccompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 illustrates a write strategy to be employed in the optical discrecording method of this embodiment. In the present invention, 1-7 PPmodulation codes are used The length of a shortest mark or space is 2 Twwhich is twice the time width (or detection window width) Tw of areference clock used for recording and reproduction, and usually, thelength of the longest mark or space is 8 Tw (which is 8 times the timewidth Tw). Note that in the present embodiment there should be a specialpattern for synchronization where 9 Tw (or 9 times the time width Tw)should be the length of a longest mark or space.

In the embodiment, the time width Tw of a reference clock used instandard reproduction should be 15.15 ns and that used in recording is3.79 ns corresponding to a 4 times speed.

When an NRZI signal is given indicative of information to be recorded onthe optical disc in a time-series manner, this signal is converted totime-series changes of the laser beam power level or an emitted lightpulse waveform by an appropriate signal processor.

Four power levels are set which include a write level Pw, anintermediate level Pm, a preheat level Ps, and a bias level Pb.Supposing that the recording film of the optical disc is in a firststate (“space” in this embodiment) in an initial state, the recordingfilm is changeable from the first state to a second state (“mark” inthis embodiment) by irradiating the recording film with the laser beamat the write level Pw. The intermediate level Pm is equal to or lessthan the write level Pw. The recording film can be shifted from thefirst level to the second level by irradiating the recording film withthe laser beam at the intermediate level Pm following the write levelPw. The preheat level Ps is lower than the intermediate level Pm. Therecording film should not shift from the first state to the second stateonly with a rise in the recording film temperature due to irradiation ofthe laser beam at the preheat level Ps. The bias level Pb is equal to orless than the preheat level Ps.

If a mark whose length is 4 Tw or more is formed on the recording film(or when the length of the NRZI signal used is 4 Tw or more), anirradiation duration at the intermediate level Pm having a lengthdepending on the mark length is provided following the irradiationduration at the write level Pw. Then, a second irradiation period at therecording level Pw is further provided following the irradiation periodat the intermediate level Pm. Mark head and end edge-side light pulsesat the write level Pw between which the irradiation duration at theintermediate level Pm is present are hereinafter referred to as head andend pulses, respectively.

When the mark length is 2 or 3 Tw, no irradiation duration at theintermediate level is provided and a laser beam at the write level Pw isirradiated in the form of a single pulse. For convenience's sake, thesingle pulse is also referred to as the head pulse.

When the mark lengths are 2 and 3 Tw, an irradiation duration at thebias level Pb is provided following the head pulse. When the mark lengthis 4 Tw or more, an irradiation duration at the bias level Pb isprovided following the end pulse.

Before the head pulse, an irradiation duration at the preheat level Psof the predetermined length is provided. A light pulse of theirradiation duration is referred to as a preheat pulse.

The definitions of the time (or position) and irradiation time (orwidth) of each pulse in the embodiment will be described. The time whenthe head pulse rises precedes by a displacement time dTtop relative to areference time which has elapsed by 1 Tw from a rise of the NRZI. Whenthe head pulse rises the displacement time dTtop after the referencetime, it should have a negative value. The irradiation time durationTtop of the head pulse should be a time duration from the rise of thehead pulse to its fall. The time at which the end pulse falls precedesby a displacement time dTlp relative to a second reference time thatprecedes by 1 Tw relative to the time when the NRZI falls. When the endpulse falls a displacement time dTlp after the second reference time, itshould have a negative value. The irradiation time duration Tlp of theend pulse should be a time duration from the rise of the end pulse toits fall. The rise time of the preheat pulse, or the end time ofcooling, precedes by a displacement time dTs relative to a thirdreference time when the NEZI falls. Like dTtop and dTlp, when thepreheat pulse rises after lapse of the displacement time dTs relative tothe reference time, it should have a negative value.

In the present invention, each of the dTtop, Ttop, dTlp, Tlp, and dTsvalues is defined as the sum of linear and nonlinear terms for thereference clock Tw. For example, dTtop is defined in the followingexpression.dTtop=a·Tw/n+b·twhere n is a predetermined integer, and Tw/n represents a pulseresolution. Letter t is a predetermined time duration which is notdependent on Tw. Letters a an b represent respective integercoefficients of the two terms. In this embodiment, for convenience ofexplanation, dTtop should be defined only with linear terms and n shouldbe 16. However, the present invention is not limited to these particularexamples. Conversely, dTtop may be defined only with nonlinear terms.Alternatively, it may include parameters defined as the sum of linearand nonlinear terms and parameters defined only with linear terms in amixed manner.

In the present embodiment, in order to deal with the aforementionedproblem of heat interference, the dTtop and Ttop each are definable as aparameter varying depending on a respective one of combinations ofprespace and record mark lengths. More specifically, as shown in alookup table of FIG. 2, the preceding space lengths are divided intothree classes for 2, 3 and 4-9 Tw, respectively, and the record marksinto four classes for 2, 3, 4 and 5-9 Tw, respectively. Thus, theparameters correspond to 12 combinations. While in FIG. 2 dTtop isillustrated as an example, this applies also to Ttop likewise.

For each of dTlp and Tlp, the record marks are divided into two classesfor 4 and 5-9 Tw, respectively, each as a different parameter. For dTs,the record marks are classified into four classes for 2, 3, 4 and 5-9Tw, respectively, each also as a different parameter.

Note that the present invention is not limited to combinations of theaforementioned prespaces and record marks, but different combinations ofprespaces and record marks may be used whose lengths are, for example,2, 3, 4 and 5-9 Tw; and 2, 3, and 4-9 Tw, respectively. Alternatively,combinations of prespaces of three (or four) different lengths andrecord marks of three (or four) different lengths may be used.Generally, as the number of classifications increases, finer control ispossible whereas as the number of classifications decreases, the numberof items of parameter information and the storage areas on a disc and ona disc apparatus which store the parameter information decreases.Therefore, it is recommended that a preferred combination is selectedfor the whole system.

In the present invention, a modulation degree (herein after referredsimply to as modulation) is specified as a necessary condition for thewrite strategy. The modulation is defined, in a reproduced signalwaveform of FIG. 3, as a ratio of an 8 Tw signal amplitude (representingthe difference between a signal level I8H of an 8 Tw space and a signallevel I8L of an 8 Tw mark) to a signal level I8H of an 8 Tw space (whichsubstantially coincides with an nonwritten level, which can be referredto as a mirror level) where the reflectance is maximum in the followingexpression:(I8H−I8L)/I8H

A method of determining a modulation condition for the initial strategyemployed in the present invention will be described below.

First, in order to record a repeated pattern of 8 Tws, the respectiveparameters of a write strategy of 8 Tw are temporarily determined. Sincethe number of combinations of preceding spaces and record marks is one,the number of parameters is 9 in all: that is, one each of dTtop, Ttop,dTlp, Tlp and dTs; and Pw, Pm, Ps and Pb. It is assumed that among theseparameters, dTtop, Ttop, Tlp, dTs, Pw, Ps and Pb have fixed values, andfor example, dTtop=8/16 Tw, Ttop=20/16 Tw, Tlp=16/16 Tw, dTs=0/16 Tw,Pw=9 mW, Ps=0.3 mW, and Pb=0.3 mW. Here, Ps=Pb implies giving nopreheat, and dTs may be indefinite. Parameters dTtop, Ttop and Tip eachare preferably determined such that sufficient pulse widths are ensuredfor a rise/fall time of the laser and that when a write strategy of 4 Twis set using the same parameter values as used in the 8 Tw writestrategy, the irradiation time duration at the intermediate level Pm isnot excessively short. Whether or not Pw is appropriate write power mustbe determined in a trial and error manner by actually writing therepeated pattern and ascertaining the modulation for each of theconditions; i.e., the parameter values of Ttop, Tlp, etc., and therecording sensitivity and speed of the disc because there is tradeoffrelation among Pw and the respective conditions. In this stage, a valuedetermined roughly by using empirical values on other discs issufficient to use as Pw.

It is assumed that Pm is a variable parameter, which is set, forexample, to 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, . . . , or 1 times Pw. In this embodiment,initially, it is set to 0.5 times Pw. The value of dTlp is set dependingon Pm, as will be described below. Initially, dTpl is set, for example,to 0/16 Tw.

A repeated pattern of marks and spaces each of 8 Tw is recorded on thedisc in a write strategy in which the respective parameters aretemporarily determined as described above. When the amplitude of asignal reproduced from the recorded data is obviously small, Pw is resetto a larger value whereas when a decrease in the mirror level appears,Pw is reset to a smaller appropriate value.

Next, the repeated pattern of marks and spaces each of 8 Tw is recordedon the disc in a write strategy where Pw is re-set to an appropriatevalue. By measuring a ratio in duration of the mark to the space wherean intermediate level between the 8 Tw mark and 8 Tw space signal levelsis a threshold value, as shown in FIG. 4, the ratio in length of themark to the space is calculated. Then, the recording and measurement arerepeated while changing dTlp so that the ratio in length of the mark tothe space is roughly 1 (unity). When the mark length is short comparedto the space length, dTlp is shifted in the negative direction, therebyincreasing the irradiation duration of the intermediate power whereas,conversely, when the mark length is large compared to the space length,dTlp is shifted in the positive direction, thereby reducing theirradiation duration of the intermediate power, which leads to adjustingthe length of the recorded mark.

Alternatively, in an AC coupled signal waveform, the signal amplitude onthe mark side is rendered roughly coincident with that on the spaceside, thereby determining the dTlp.

A repeated pattern of marks and spaces each of 8 Tw where the markroughly coincides in length with the space, as obtained in accordancewith the procedures just mentioned, is recorded on the disc in a tracklayout such as shown in FIG. 5. More particularly, tracks 1-5 arerecorded successively, a track 6 is left unrecorded, and then tracks 7and 8 are recorded successively.

The signal level of the track 3 is then measured using a spectrumanalyzer. This signal level is hereinafter referred to as an 8 Twcarrier level. Since in the embodiment 1 Tw is 15.15 ns in the standardreproduction, the frequency of the 8 Tw repeated pattern is 4.125 MHz.

In an unrecorded track 6, the level of a signal of 4.125 MHz is measuredas in the track 3. The signal observed here is mainly a cross talk basedon signals recorded on the tracks 5 and 6 between which the track 6 ispresent, and the level of the signal will be hereinafter referred to asan 8 Tw cross talk level.

Returning again to the track 3, the aforementioned modulation is nowmeasured, using an oscilloscope this time.

Then, Pm is re-set to 0.6 times Pw, the 8 Tw repeated pattern isrecorded on the disc, and then dTlp is determined so that the marklength substantially coincides with the space length. In this case, therepeated pattern is recorded in the predetermined track layout, and thenthe carrier level, cross talk level and modulation are measured.Further, the series of processes are repeated while changing Pmsequentially to 0.7, 0.8 Pw, . . . .

Then, an evaluation index α is calculated from the measured values ofthe carrier level, cross talk level, and modulation for each set Pmvalue:α=k*C−CTwhere C is the 8 Tw carrier level, CT the 8 Tw cross talk level, and k aweighting coefficient that compensates for a difference in influencesexerted on the recorded qualities of C and CT. In the presentembodiment, k=4. The arithmetic expression is one example forcalculating the evaluation index α, and another expression may be usedin which α is calculated based on C and CT.

The range of modulation degrees that can be measured varies depending onthe set Pw value. Thus, the set Pw value is changed in a moreappropriate range, and the aforementioned series of operations areperformed. That is, Pm is set to several values, dTlp is determined suchthat the mark and space lengths of the 8 Tw repeated patternsubstantially coincide for each of the set Pm values, and then thecarrier level, cross talk level and modulation are measured.

As illustrated in FIG. 6, results of measurement of a modulation foreach of Pw and Pm are plotted on an X-axis and evaluation indexes α areplotted on the Y-axis.

In FIG. 6, the evaluation index α is peak when the modulation is 61-64%.The evaluation index α tends to decrease leftward in a range of 60% orless of the modulation, decrease leftward, and be saturated in thevicinity of 67%. In the present embodiment, the range of 61-65% wherethe evaluation index α is peak is determined as a necessary conditionfor the modulation of the initial strategy.

Then, the respective parameters are determined in the initial strategy.As described above, four Pw, Pm, Ps and Pb parameters are determined forpower. For the light emission timing, 12 different dTtop and 12different Ttop parameters are determined for each of the combinations ofprespaces and record marks; 2 different dTlp and 2 different Tlpparameters are determined for each record mark; and 4 different dTsparameters are determined for each record mark. That is, 36 parametersin all are determined.

The value of Pm in the write strategy where the evaluation index α ismaximum is treated as a provisional value of Pm in the initial strategy.The provisional Pm value is 5.5 mW in this embodiment. Pb should be 0.3mW which is the same as the reproduced power.

Each of dTtop, Ttop, dTlp, Tlp for 4 and 5-9 Tw record marks is set tobe a corresponding one of the values used in recording the 8 Tw repeatedpattern and the same values are used without regard to theclassification of the preceding space lengths. When, for the 4Tw recordmark, the irradiation duration of the intermediate power is short and,for example, 0.5 Tw or more cannot ensured, Ttop and Tlp for 4 Tw areset to values smaller than Ttop and Tlp for 5-9 Tw. Alternatively, Ttopand Tlp for 5-9 Tw also may be re-set to smaller values.

In ensuring the record qualities of all the marks and spaces, the recordqualities (or jitters) of the shortest mark and space are dominant.However, since in the embodiment the shortest mark and space have the 2Tw length, it is especially important to ensure the record qualities ofthe 2 Tw mark and 2 Tw space. Therefore, in the initial stage, it ispreferable that n levels are set for each of the parameters for thewrite strategy of 2 Tw, and then the corresponding record qualities arecompared without limiting the number of parameters to one.

In the present embodiment, each of a top pulse width Ttop of the 2 Twrecord mark, and combinations of dTs and Ps related to the preheatquantity is given three levels. Thus, for example, Ttop has a first, asecond and a third level of 16/16, 20/16 and 24/16 Tw, respectively.Each of the combinations of dTs and Ps has a first, a second and a thirdlevel of −24/16 Tw and 0.3 mW; −24/16 Tw and 2 mW; and −8/16 Tw and 2mW, respectively: i.e., 9 levels in all.

In the following description, it is assumed that each of Ttop, dTs andPs is set to the corresponding first level.

The dTtop of the 2 Tw record mark should be the same value (that is 8/16Tw in this embodiment) as dTtop of the 4-9 Tw record mark. Conversely,the dTs of the 4-9 Tw record mark should be the same value (that is−24/16 Tw in this embodiment) as the dTs of the 2 Tw record mark.

The dTtop and dTs of the 3 Tw record mark should also be the same valueas the other record marks. The Ttop should be a value (which is 32/16Tw), for example, larger by 1 Tw than Ttop of the 2 Tw record mark valueby referring to Ttop of the 2 Tw record mark.

In this stage, all the parameters excluding Pw are temporarilydetermined. Note that Ttop and dTtop of each of the record marks shouldtake the same value irrespective of the classification of the prespacelengths.

Here, Pw is set to any particular value, and then random data isrecorded for one track on a disc, for example, as values used in themeasurement of the cross talk. The recorded data is then reproduced andtheir modulation and asymmetry are measured. The asymmetry is a signalevaluation index obtained by normalizing the difference between anaverage level of the shortest mark and shortest space signal (in theembodiment, of 2 Tw) and an average level of the long mark and longspace signal (in the embodiment, of 8 Tw) with the amplitude of the longmark and long space signal, as defined in the following expression:[(I8H+I8L)/2−(I2H+I2L)/2]/(I8H−I8L)where I8H and I8L represent the 8 Tw space signal level and the 8 Twmark signal level, respectively, as described above, and I2H and I2Lsimilarly represent the 2 Tw space signal level and the 2 Tw mark signallevel, respectively.

When the asymmetry is a positive large value, Pw is re-set to a smallervalue whereas when the asymmetry is a negative large value, Pw is resetto a larger value. Thus, the record, reproduction and measurement ofrandom patterns are repeated until the asymmetry falls in an appropriaterange involving the vicinities of zero, thereby determining Pw. Further,it is ascertained that the modulation is within the range of necessaryconditions for the initial strategy.

Then, random data is recorded for one track on a disc with the Pwdetermined in the above process, the recorded data is reproduced andamounts of deviation of the preedge and postedge of each mark relativeto the clock are measured. In this case, the preceding space lengths aredivided into three classes for 2, 3 and 4-9 Tw, respectively, the recordmark lengths are divided into four classes for 2, 3, 4 and 5-9 Tw,respectively, and those amounts of deviation are measured for each ofcombinations of the preceding spaces and record marks.

In order to eliminate a deviation of the preedge of 4-9 Tw, dTtop andTtop are adjusted. When the preedge advances relative to the clock, theset value of dTtop is moved in the negative direction or the set valueof Ttop is decreased or both are used in combination. Conversely, whenthe preedge lags relative to the clock, the set value of dTtop is movedin the positive direction or the set value of Ttop is increased or bothare used in combination.

In order to eliminate a deviation of the postedge of 4-9 Tw, dTlp andTlp are adjusted. When the preedge advances relative to the clock, theset value of dTlp is moved in the negative direction or the set value ofTlop is increased or both are used in combination. Conversely, when thepreedge lags relative to the clock, the set value of dTlp is moved inthe positive direction or the set value of Tlp is decreased or both areused in combination.

In order to eliminate a deviation of the preedge of 2 and 3 Tw, dTtop isadjusted. As in 4-9Tw, when the preedge advances relative to the clock,the set value of dTtop is moved in the negative direction. Conversely,when the preedge lags relative to the clock, the set value of dTtop ismoved in the positive direction.

In order to eliminate a deviation of the postedge of 3 Tw, Ttop isadjusted. When the preedge advances relative to the clock, the set valueof Tlp is increased. Conversely, when the preedge lags relative to theclock, the set value of Ttop is decreased.

In order to eliminate a deviation of the postedge of 2 Tw, the postedgeof 3-9 Tw is moved relatively and its position is adjusted. Moreparticularly, when the postedge advances relative to the clock, the 2 Twmark is considered to be short relatively. Thus, the respectiveparameters are adjusted such that the mark of 3-9 Tw is shortened.Conversely, when the postedge lags relative to the clock, the 2 Tw markis considered to be long relatively. Thus, the respective parameters areadjusted such that the mark of 3-9 Tw is lengthened.

Alternatively, the respective mark lengths may be measured instead ofthe deviations of the respective mark edges. In this case, the relationin correspondence between the respective parameters and the results ofmeasurement of the mark lengths is not clear. Thus, although thefrequency of use of the trial and error method increases in theadjustment of the respective parameters, the measurement itself isexpected to be simplified.

Thus, in the above process, the respective record mark and space lengthsof 2-9 Tw are adjusted so as to roughly coincide with theircorresponding theoretical values, thereby enabling the jittermeasurement. Further, it is expected that the symmetry is in anappropriate range and the modulation meets the aforementionedconditions. The write strategy in this stage is treated as the initialstrategy. Especially, in the present invention, the initial strategywhere the 2 Tw parameters are not optimized is hereinafter referred toas a local initial strategy.

Next, the respective parameters Pw, Pm and Ps relating to the power arefinely adjusted, thereby compensating for a remaining unadjusteddeviation of the mark edge. Pw, Pm and Ps are incremented or decrementedin small steps around the parameters used in the initial strategy,random signals are recorded on the disc under the respective conditions,the recorded data is reproduced and then jitter is measured. And, Pw, Pmand Ps having minimum jitter are obtained.

The respective parameters dTtop, Ttop, Tlp, dTlp, and dTs relating tothe pulse timing are finely adjusted to obtain an optimal strategy inthe vicinity of the local initial strategy. Especially, in the presentinvention, the optimal strategy corresponding to the local initialstrategy is hereinafter referred to as a local optimal strategy.

Then, random data is recorded in three continuous track or more with thelocal optimal strategy, recorded data on a track with recorded data onits either side is reproduced, and the jitter, asymmetry and modulationare measured.

As described above, it is preferable that each of the parameters for the2 Tw recorded mark is given a plurality of levels at each of which alocal initial strategy is set, that a local optimal strategy in thevicinity of a corresponding local initial strategy is calculated, andthat the recording qualities obtained in the respective local optimalstrategies are compared and verified.

In the present embodiment, the reproduced jitter on the track withrecorded data on each side of the track is used as an index of therecord quality. In FIG. 9, a 2 Tw pulse width Ttop and the reproducedjitter are plotted on the horizontal and vertical axes, respectively. InFIG. 10, a preheat quantity, (dTs+32/16)*Ps, and the reproduced jitterare plotted on the horizontal and vertical axes, respectively. FIGS. 9and 10 both illustrate an approximate conic. In FIG. 9, the reproducedjitter is minimum when Ttop is in a range of 19/16-20/16 Tw. In FIG. 10,the reproduced jitter is minimum when the preheat quantity is in a rangeof 22/16-30/16 Tw-mw. From this, in the present embodiment the optimal 2Tw parameters are determined as Ttop=20/16 Tw, dTs=−18/16 Tw, and Ps=2mW.

The indexes of the record quality include various strategy margins suchas the respective mark and space lengths, asymmetry and modulation, achange of the reproduced jitter corresponding to a change of therecording power, and a change of the reproduced jitter corresponding toa change in the pulse width. Further, there is a condition that therecording power Pw is preferably small to restrict the maximum lightemission power of the laser beam source. Thus, the write strategy may bedetermined by considering all these things synthetically.

The initial strategy is again determined using the optimal parameters ofthe 2 Tw recorded marks determined based on the results of thecomparison and verification, and then an optimal strategy is sought inthe vicinity of the initial strategy and employed as the optimalstrategy for the disc of interest.

Alternatively, if the optimal strategy of a different disc similar inrecording film characteristic to the disc of interest is known, it canbe expected that a roughly good characteristic is obtained even by usingthe 2 Tw parameters of the different disc to determine the initialstrategy.

A method of determining the write strategy in the present embodimentdescribed in detail above will be organized using a flowchart of FIG. 7.

First, step 1 determines the modulation conditions of the initialstrategy from the results of measurement of the carrier and cross talklevels of the 8T repeated signal. Step 2 defines n levels of each of the2 Tw parameter values. Step 3 determines local initial strategiescorresponding to the n levels. Step 4 determines a local optimalstrategy in the vicinity of the local initial strategy. Steps 3 and 4are repeated n times while changing the 2 Tw parameter values to the nrespective levels. Step 5 compares and verifies the local optimalstrategies in the vicinity of the local initial strategies at therespective levels to determine optimal 2 Tw parameters. Step 6determines the initial strategy with the optimal 2 Tw parameters as instep 3. Step 7 determines an optimal strategy in the vicinity of theinitial strategy as in step 5. Thus, the write strategy determined instep 7 is treated as the optimal strategy for the disc of interest.

The optimal strategy of the inventive optical disc obtained in theprocedures described above is beforehand stored as one of items of discinformation in the control data area of the disc. As shown in FIG. 8, inthe present embodiment the control data area is disposed in aninnermost-peripheral read-in area different from a user data area wherethe user is able to record data freely. The optimal strategy is alsorecorded as disc information in the form of a track wobble along withaddress information throughout the whole surface of the disc. Note thatpredetermined bits of the control data are defined beforehand so as tocorrespond to the respective parameters of the write strategy.

While there can be a plurality of write strategies to be recorded as thedisc information in the control data area, for example, for each of therecording speeds, in the inventive optical disc at least one of theplurality of record strategies is determined in accordance with theprocedures of the present invention.

Alternatively, the control data area may be disposed in the read-outarea along the outermost periphery of the disc.

The inventive optical disc apparatus reproduces data on the inventiveoptical disc, and reads out predetermined bit information of the controldata as the disc information, thereby acquiring the respective parametervalues of the optimal strategy stored on the disc. The optical discapparatus adjusts the respective parameters as described above, usingthe optimal write strategy as the initial one, and then again acquiringan optimal strategy in the vicinity of the initial strategy.

The optimal parameter of the write strategy can vary among optical discapparatuses, mainly due to the performance of the optical pickup usedincluding, for example, aberration performance of a light spot andrise/fall performance of the laser beam. By virtue of the measure of thepresent invention described above, however, the unevenness of recordingqualities among the respective disc apparatuses can be suppressed.According to the present invention, the time required to determine thewrite strategy, and a test write area of the optical disc can be reducedcompared to the case in which the initial strategy is determined foreach of the optical disc apparatuses.

While, in the embodiment, the so-called castle type strategies have beenillustrated which include use of the head and end pulses which irradiatePw as a write strategy for a long mark, the present invention is notlimited to these particular cases. For example, a so-called L-likestrategy that includes use of only a head pulse as the irradiating onefor Pw and a so-called multi-pulse type strategy that includes use of acomb-type pulse as the Pw irradiation pulse in addition to the headpulse are expected to produce similar advantages in almost similarprocesses.

It should be further understood by those skilled in the art thatalthough the foregoing description has been made on embodiments of theinvention, the invention is not limited thereto and various changes andmodifications may be made without departing from the spirit of theinvention and the scope of the appended claims.

1. A method of determining a write strategy to record data byirradiating an optical disc with a laser beam, the method comprising: afirst step of determining modulation conditions for the data to berecorded on the optical disc, by recording repeated data of marks andspaces of a predetermined length on the optical disc, and reproducingthe data, measuring a signal level, a cross talk level and a modulationof the data, and then determining the modulation conditions based on theresults of the measurement; a second step of determining a firststrategy that meets the modulation conditions; and a third step ofmeasuring a record quality in the vicinity of the first strategy, anddetermining a second strategy; wherein the second step comprises:determining parameters of a write strategy for a shortest mark and thenrecording data on the parameters on the optical disc; and reproducingthe data, measuring its asymmetry and mark edge position or mark length,and then determining the respective parameters of the first strategybased on results of the measurement.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein:the second step further comprises determining each of the parameters ofthe write strategy for the shortest mark at a plurality of levels; andthe third step comprises measuring a record quality of the shortest markat a respective one of the plurality of levels and then determining thesecond strategy based on results of the measurement.
 3. The method ofclaim 1, wherein: the second step comprises determining each of theparameters of the write strategy for the shortest mark at a plurality oflevels; and the third step comprises measuring a record quality of theshortest mark at a respective one of the plurality of levels and thendetermining the second strategy based on results of the measurement. 4.An optical disc wherein information on a recommended write strategy isbeforehand recorded in a predetermined control data area of the disc,wherein the recommended write strategy is determined in: a first step ofdetermining modulation conditions for data to be recorded on the opticaldisc; a second step of determining a first strategy that meets themodulation conditions; and a third step of measuring a record quality ofthe data in the vicinity of the first strategy, and then determining therecommended write strategy; wherein the second step comprises:determining parameters of a write strategy for a shortest mark and thenrecording data on the parameters on the optical disc; and reproducingthe data, measuring its asymmetry and mark edge position or mark length,and then determining the respective parameters of the first strategybased on results of the measurement.
 5. The optical disc of claim 4,wherein the first step comprises: recording repeated data of marks andspaces of a predetermined length on the optical disc; and reproducingthe data, measuring a signal level, a cross talk level and a modulationof the data, and then determining the modulation conditions based on theresults of the measurement.
 6. The optical disc of claim 4, wherein: thesecond step further comprises determining each of the parameters of thewrite strategy for the shortest mark at a plurality of levels; and thethird step comprises measuring a record quality of the shortest mark ata respective one of the plurality of levels and then determining thesecond strategy based on results of the measurement.
 7. An optical discrecording method that records data on an optical disc by irradiating theoptical disc with a laser beam, comprising: a first step of determiningmodulation conditions for the data to be recorded on the optical disc; asecond step of determining a first strategy that meets the modulationconditions; a third step of measuring a record quality of the data inthe vicinity of the first strategy and then determining a secondstrategy; and a final step of recording data using the second strategy;wherein the first step comprises: recording repeated data of marks andspaces of a predetermined length on the optical disc; and reproducingthe data, measuring a signal level, a cross talk level and a modulationof the data, and then determining the modulation conditions based on theresults of the measurement; and wherein the second step comprises:determining parameters of a write strategy for a shortest mark and thenrecording data on the parameters on the optical disc; and reproducingthe data, measuring its asymmetry and mark edge position or mark length,and then determining the respective parameters of the first strategybased on results of the measurement.
 8. The optical disc recordingmethod of claim 7, wherein: the second step further comprisesdetermining each of the parameters of the write strategy for theshortest mark at a plurality of levels; and the third step comprisesmeasuring a record quality of the shortest mark at a respective one ofthe plurality of levels and then determining the second strategy basedon results of the measurement.
 9. An optical disc apparatus forrecording or reproducing information to or from an optical disc whereinformation on a recommended write strategy is beforehand recorded in apredetermined control data area of the disc, and wherein the recommendedwrite strategy is determined in: a first step of determining modulationconditions for data to be recorded on the optical disc; a second step ofdetermining a first strategy that meets the modulation conditions; and athird step of measuring the record quality of the data in the vicinityof the first strategy and then determining the recommended strategy;wherein the first step comprises: recording repeated data of marks andspaces of a predetermined length on the optical disc; and reproducingthe data, measuring a signal level, a cross talk level and a modulationof the data, and then determining the modulation conditions based on theresults of the measurement; and wherein the second step comprises:determining parameters of a write strategy for a shortest mark and thenrecording data on the parameters on the optical disc; and reproducingthe data, measuring its asymmetry and mark edge position or mark length,and then determining the respective parameters of the first strategybased on results of the measurement.
 10. The optical disc apparatus ofclaim 9, wherein: the second step further comprises determining each ofthe parameters of the write strategy for the shortest mark at aplurality of levels; and the third step comprises measuring a recordquality of the shortest mark at a respective one of the plurality oflevels and then determining the second strategy based on results of themeasurement.